Alexander at Palm Court

The broad County response returns Alexander at Palm Court under 26-3S-18-16200 and Palm Court Subdivision under 36-3S-18-16101. The latter was recorded in 2019, long after Alexander's 2003 header, and has a different project name and series. This guide excludes it completely; nearby naming is not evidence of a shared declaration, boundary, association, or inventory pool.

County condominium rows run 201-207, 301-307, and 401-407, creating three groups of seven. The seven commercial entries use CS1-CS7 instead and carry a stores classification. This structure makes it possible to distinguish administrative residential and commercial records without claiming current physical use, floor plans, tenants, storefronts, occupancy, lawful operation, or availability.

Florida's North Florida condominium extract identifies ALEXANDER AT PALM COURT, A CONDO in Walton County and reports 21 units, an initial date of September 29, 2006, and Approved/Recorded fields. That count matches the County's 21 condominium rows, not all 28 mixed-use entries. The sources therefore complement one another rather than supporting a claim that commercial codes are residential units.

The County header's third legal field begins with TERMINATION OF THAT DECL RECD, but the available excerpt does not provide the entire instrument or its consequence. Detailed County rows and the state registry still carry the project name. The Atlas reports this tension instead of choosing a legal answer; current title evidence, the original declaration, the referenced instrument, later amendments, and counsel review control.

The address service assigns 9961 East County Highway 30A to residential row 301. All other twenty residential entries, all seven CS records, and the header say NO ADDRESS ASSIGNED. The point can indicate the mixed-use family generally, but it cannot place a residence, a commercial space, a lobby, parking, delivery access, or an outer wall. No GeoJSON is published.

A residential purchaser should reconcile the unit's 16200 identifier, deed, title, declaration status, amendments, association documents, financials, assessments, insurance, inspections, permits, parking, access, leasing, and pet rules. A commercial-interest review also needs current permitted use, tenant and lease material, signage and delivery provisions, insurance allocation, accessibility, and governing restrictions. One category's documents cannot safely be generalized to the other.

Mixed-use naming makes false positives especially consequential: an address-only result might represent another interest near 30A. A future exact handoff must be checked against the project name, 16200 family, residential number bands, and CS codes before the Atlas can describe returned properties as project-specific.