Harbor Landing II

The parcel family names Harbor Landing Phase II, and its detailed legal descriptions use B-suffixed unit labels. Phase I is independently recorded under 1925 with A-series units. That consistent pairing makes Phase II a defensible tower-level subject while preserving Harbor Landing as the shared parent project.

The 1926 header states 44 units and the records show 44 condominium entries after it. Unlike a marketing estimate, both numbers come from the same County family. They describe the assessed record set and do not measure current occupancy, listing supply, rental participation, voting interests, or physical condition.

The building-year field is 2006 on all 44 Phase II condominium rows. The consistency supports a project-era reference for this building. It does not establish when a specific unit was finished or remodeled, whether permits were closed, or whether current structural, life-safety, or insurance requirements have been satisfied.

County public-safety data returns 44 addresses labeled Harbor Landing Phase 2 and one additional feature labeled Harbor Landing Clubhouse at 725E Gulf Shore Drive. The separate label prevents the common facility from being counted as a residential unit or used to shift the tower's representative point.

The coordinate at 30.385314, -86.485989 averages only the 44 Phase 2 unit geometries. It is an orientation aid for the B-series tower. It does not identify a unit door, lobby, elevator, parking stall, dock, wet slip, shoreline, beach path, parcel boundary, or emergency entrance.

Some Harbor Landing legal descriptions include parking or wet-slip references, but those clauses vary by row. The Atlas does not generalize them into a tower-wide marina entitlement. Any slip, parking, storage, or common-element claim must match the exact unit's current deed, declaration, amendments, assignment records, and title commitment.

Both phases use 725 Gulf Shore Drive, yet their family keys, suffixes, record totals, and unit clusters are separate. A shared street address and parent association context therefore do not erase the buyer-facing need to identify the correct tower and phase before reviewing documents or interpreting a listing.

No exact owner route has been verified for only the 1926/B-series records. The page stays free of inventory claims. A transaction review should cover Phase II instruments, shared-project obligations, budgets, reserves, assessments, insurance, structural records, permits, docks, access, parking, rentals, pets, disclosures, title, survey, and contract language.