Crescent at Miramar Beach

The County's broad name response includes Crescent Caye, Crescent Mill at Hammock Bay, Crescent Beach Cottages, and The Crescent at Miramar Beach. Only the last carries family 33-2S-21-42900 and the condominium-book reference CB4-43. This page anchors on that exact series rather than using a partial-name match that could pull records from another market or property type.

The parcel endpoint returns 17 identifiers in each of four hundreds: 101-117, 201-217, 301-317, and 401-417. A separate 00A0 row describes common and limited common elements. This pattern is useful when checking whether an advertised number belongs to the recorded family, but it does not reveal floor elevation, interior plan, physical location, occupancy, or market status.

DBPR's North Florida file identifies THE CRESCENT AT MIRAMAR BEACH, A CONDO and reports 68 units, an initial date of March 30, 1998, and Approved/Recorded fields. Walton County's header separately says the condominium was recorded March 10, 1998. The sources reinforce identity and scale; the date difference is preserved because each registry is describing its own administrative event.

Fourteen Monaco Street is attached to the common-elements key, while 50 Monaco Street belongs to unit 215. The other 67 address records contain no assigned address. Averaging the two available coordinates supplies a stable visual center, not the location of every residence. It should never be used to select a door, parking space, emergency entrance, delivery point, or insured structure.

The 00A0 legal text confirms that common and limited common elements exist in the recorded framework. It does not identify which physical features fall into either category or who may use them. Beach access, pools, gates, parking, storage, balconies, maintenance obligations, and exclusive-use rights require the current declaration, amendments, rules, survey materials, and unit-specific title review.

Start by matching its number to the 42900 family and comparing the deed, title commitment, current declaration, recent amendments, association financials, reserve and assessment information, master-insurance evidence, inspection reports, rental restrictions, pet and vehicle rules, and listing disclosures. The four number bands make identity checking easier, but nothing in the registry responses establishes present condition or transaction suitability.

Because the reviewed sources do not furnish a defensible project outline, no GeoJSON polygon is published. A future building link should remain off until its returned listings can be tested against the exact project name, 42900 family, Monaco Street evidence, and unit sequence.